The Life We Bury by Allen Eskens
Mysteries are not normally the genre of books I choose but this book really spoke to me. I have always been fearful of being wrongfully accused of a crime and that is the premise for this story. The title of the book was also a draw with the mystery of what is buried and that everyone has secrets that they bury with them.
I enjoyed the beginning that delved into the life of Carl Iverson, starting with him as a murderer. The author focused on the fact that although we judge this man based on the one (alleged) act, he is more than just one moment in time. Joe Talbert begins to unravel the life of Carl Iverson from beginning to end and shows the compassionate side of Carl, as well as the dependable and loyal side of Carl. I shows the fact that a law abiding citizen was caught up in a crime and although he has served his time, he may not have committed the crime.
It is an unbelievable possibility that the dying Carl is an innocent man and has been imprisoned wrongfully for decades. As Joe begins to research Carl’s history, he begins to understand the kind of man Carl is and that he may be incapable of committing this crime, despite the fact that he has admitted to being a killer and a murderer. However, his guilt comes from Vietnam and not from the killing of the young girl. “I’ve always known I didn’t kill her. And now you know. That’s enough for me (page 190).” It was tragic to know that he was innocent but had little time to be exonerated despite the evidence of his innocence. “Clearing his name mattered more to him than he had allowed anyone to see, maybe even more than he himself understood (page 246).”
The decoding of the diary was a good little twist but makes me wonder that the simplicity of it would make it easy to solve at the time of the trial. There were a few loose ends left in the story and there were several simple things that really gave away the criminal before the story unfolded. There was no reason to arrest Carl other than the fact that the crime happened on his property. The premise and justification for his guilt was weak and there were no other avenues searched for answers to the crime.
I enjoyed the telling of Carl’s story through the interview process. I felt that the crime was being unraveled from the stories being told from all sides. I feel that the ending did not give enough weight to Carl Iverson and had changed its focus from the dying man to the young Joe, who solves the case. I would have preferred a full circle ending to the story of Carl Iverson. I think that the novel was good but could have used better “mysterious” hints and clues.
What was your opinion of the title? Did it sum up the story? Did the novel live up to the title?
What did you think of the crime committed?
Did you figure out the culprit before the book divulged it?
What did you think of the mystery? Was it complex enough or too simple?
How did you feel about the Joe Talbert storyline?
Did you feel that something was missing from the story?
Do you enjoy the mystery genre?
Recent Comments